In an era marked by globalization, the strategic initiative of the Chinese automotive industry to expand overseas is drawing increasing attention. The steady growth of traditional vehicle exports not only underscores the competitive edge of China's manufacturing sector but also signifies the country's evolving role within the global marketplace. As Chinese companies navigate the challenges and opportunities that international markets present, they are learning from the outward-oriented economic development model of Japan while also seeking new collaborative pathways with regions such as Europe. Nevertheless, the expansion of production capacity raises apprehensions about oversupply; thus, finding mutually beneficial solutions amidst the headwinds of protectionism is becoming crucial for these 'going out' strategies undertaken by Chinese enterprises.

The phenomenon of 'going out' is of tremendous significance, influencing not only current economic growth but also potentially shaping the future economic landscape. Concerns have been voiced by the public, particularly regarding the export sector, which is one of the three main pillars of the Chinese economy. While current conditions appear favorable, future prospects could be impeded by rising protectionist measures in the U.S. and Europe. Such limitations may impact various industries, including solar energy, new-energy vehicles, and lithium batteries, leading to a distinctly different export environment compared to the past.

Historically, wars were primarily fought over the plunder of resources. However, as time wore on, the nature of conflict gradually shifted towards securing resources through trade, which remains a viable means of resource acquisition. The United States exemplifies an advanced approach in this arena, utilizing financial maneuvers or other methods to monopolize the most lucrative or critical segments of production chains. America’s dominance in high technology, particularly in various industries where it monopolizes design and standard-setting, affords it a natural competitive edge. In the past, China's overseas ventures primarily focused on exporting low-end products that posed minimal competitive threat and sometimes involved roles undesirable to American workers. Now, however, China is advancing towards higher-end markets, inevitably encroaching on the core interests of countries like the United States, thus leading to friction.

Previously, the pathway to expanding abroad was straightforward—effort alone was sufficient. Now, the landscape has changed and, alongside continued diligence, lofty obstacles must also be surmounted, complicating the development process considerably.

Upon detailed investigation, it becomes evident that the 'rural encircling the city' strategy is profoundly insightful for guiding overseas strategies. This approach has been observed not just in domestic conflicts but has also implications for international endeavors. Initially, Chinese products entered poorer and more marginal areas before progressively infiltrating core regions. A pertinent example is Huawei's international market expansion, which commenced in smaller markets before gradually advancing to prime sectors.

Traditionally, China's product positioning has catered primarily to low-end markets—starting from the periphery. This can be likened to a 'rural' situation, but as time has progressed, Chinese enterprises have begun their march toward the 'city' or core markets. Presently, Chinese products possess robust competitive advantages and exert a significant influence on the international market, rendering the overwhelming presence of Chinese brands seemingly unstoppable.

By analyzing market data, businesses can discern which obstacles are surmountable and which merely represent superficial noise. It is crucial to deeply contemplate the overseas expansion strategy while honing in on specific products or stocks. At present, three focal points warrant attention: new energy vehicles, lithium batteries, and solar photovoltaics. These sectors should receive ongoing investment and concentration.

Furthermore, the 'going out' strategy must also account for the importance of service trade. While this may not currently be a strong suit, China's Belt and Road Initiative aims to foster comprehensive cooperation, extending from infrastructure development to the industrial and energy sectors. China's prowess in infrastructure construction, often dubbed a 'construction mania', is perceived as emblematic of a successful 'going out' strategy. A deeper exploration and continual innovation within this strategy are essential moving forward.

At this juncture, we advocate for a focused discussion surrounding the implications of electricity in future developments. Artificial intelligence signifies tomorrow's forefront, while power itself emerges as a crucial resource—and potentially a scarce commodity. Should this trend persist, global advancements may pivot around power infrastructure and supply. Industries that provide foundational services for electricity, such as power equipment manufacturing and power engineering construction, stand poised to reap significant profits, especially in light of increasing demands tied to power plant establishments.

China's notable strength in the electrical sector, particularly regarding ultra-high voltage technology, places it at the forefront globally. The efficient transmission of power across international borders will be vital, especially in addressing disparities in power demands between different regions, such as the United States' east and west coasts. In the future, international competition may ultimately hinge on the mastery and efficient utilization of energy resources.

Take Vietnam as an instance; the nation expresses a desire to utilize China's electrical resources. However, without robust energy transmission capabilities, significant losses may occur throughout the electricity transit process. Should ultra-high voltage solutions achieve satisfactory advancements, facilitating effective inter-regional power use, the issue of timing inefficiency in electricity consumption can be effectively resolved.

Typically, electricity costs less during the night compared to daytime due to the difficulties in storing generated power. Unutilized electricity results in wasted resources; power companies often sell electricity at lower prices during off-peak hours. However, if we enhance transmission capacities to enable power sharing across various regions—aligning our daytime consumption with other nations' night-times—this could equilibrate energy usage and associated costs.

Thus, strengthening research on electrical equipment, engaging with foreign power industry infrastructures, including the establishment of thermal power plants, should be a significant consideration. Current discussions surrounding potential environmental impacts of new coal-fired power plants, a major concern linked to the dual carbon goals, necessitate a mature and comprehensive assessment.

The automotive export initiative is also an area of great concern for us. Within the traditional vehicle sector, China has already established a compelling competitive presence through significant product exports. Without this competitive edge, access to international markets would remain unattainable. By examining Japan's situation, we note Japan's limited land, small population, and scarce resources necessitated an outward-oriented economic model. Conversely, China excels internally and externally, possessing a massive domestic demand while also showcasing formidable export capabilities. Nonetheless, there are valuable takeaways from Japan’s developmental experiences.

In the face of rising trade protectionism, the establishment of overseas manufacturing bases, such as in Europe, may become necessary; gaining entry through the European Union’s trade regulations opens vast market opportunities. Recent diplomatic visits, such as that of the German Chancellor, exemplify strategic cooperation; the acknowledgment of globalization's inevitability paves pathways for partnerships. This mirrors the strategies employed by foreign enterprises when they first approached the Chinese market, such as equity distribution in joint ventures.

This collaborative model can be applied to our international expansion, where we assume the role of the foreign entity. By leveraging a robust industrial ecosystem into overseas markets, parallels to Japanese strategies are discernible.

Nevertheless, we must remain cognizant of the apprehensions some nations hold regarding our industrial expansion. Fears of a flooded market with excess capacity could devastate local industries. Historical incidences, wherein excess product supply contributed to economic downturns—illustrated by the dumping of milk into rivers not out of scarcity but rather surplus—remind us of past economic vulnerabilities.

Despite these lingering concerns, I maintain that myriad opportunities persist within the fabric of overseas ventures. A thoughtful examination of these dynamics is essential as we develop appropriate strategies to contend with the challenges incumbent upon globalization.